Cognitive Dissonance Theory TheoryHub Academic theories reviews for research and T&L

according to cognitive dissonance theory human beings are motivated to

Some groups control believers through their cell phone with GPS tracking, and frequent texting or calls. Others hand out programs that include net nannies so that members will be blocked from critical sites. At the far end of the spectrum is total authority over information, or totalitarianism.

  • Consequently, an increasing number of people became largely separated from animals used in food production and, thus, had less contact with the animals they consumed.
  • This might involve going along with something due to peer pressure or doing something at work to avoid getting fired.
  • Sometimes, members are coerced into repenting publicly and confessing these negative emotions.
  • The result suggests that participants may have been motivated to reconsider the information provided by the expert after the therapy session.

Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action-control

The theory of cognitive dissonance proposes that people are averse to inconsistencies within their own minds. It offers one explanation for why people sometimes make an effort to adjust their thinking when their own thoughts, words, or behaviors seem to clash with each other. The children had a choice to make–play with the toy that they really wanted and face punishment, or ignore their desire for the toy.

Stages of change profiles in outpatient alcoholism treatment

according to cognitive dissonance theory human beings are motivated to

Research has shown that when an individual engages in behaviors that are inconsistent with their attitude or belief (e.g., arguing a counter-attitudinal position on a topic), a change in attitude is produced that is consistent in the direction of his or her behavior. This mechanism of thought or attitude change is the same mechanism used to produce changes in negative, irrational thoughts that are involved in the maintenance of depression and related disorders. The literature that is based on cognitive dissonance theory has broadly covered four phases of the process, namely, cognitive discrepancy, dissonance, motivation and discrepancy reduction (Hinojosa et al., 2017).

The functional architecture of human motivation: Personality systems interactions theory

Each level directs behaviour toward the need level that is not being adequately met. As lower-level needs are met, the motivation to meet the higher-level needs becomes active. Furthermore, as an individual progresses upward, it becomes progressively more difficult to successfully fulfill the needs of each higher level. For this reason Maslow believed that very few people actually reach the level of self-actualization, and it is a lifelong process for the cognitive dissonance and addiction few who do. A person who feels defensive or unhappy might consider the role cognitive dissonance might play in these feelings. If they are part of a wider problem that is causing distress, people may benefit from speaking with a therapist.

  • Others hand out programs that include net nannies so that members will be blocked from critical sites.
  • It is possible to resolve cognitive dissonance by either changing one’s behavior or changing one’s beliefs so they are consistent with each other.
  • The “strong initiation” group of subjects were to read aloud twelve sexual words considered obscene.
  • However, the one-dollar group rated the tasks positively, while the twenty-dollar group rated the tasks negatively.

according to cognitive dissonance theory human beings are motivated to

As people learn by doing, they are socially influenced by self-consistency and commitment, according to another of Cialdini’s compliance principles. The Zajonc mere exposure theory describes people favoring people and objects encountered frequently. Similarly, people are attracted to people in propinquity (close proximity) (Festinger, Schachter, and Back), perhaps because of exposure.

according to cognitive dissonance theory human beings are motivated to

Self-schema theory (Markus) describes few, core dimensions for efficiently organizing self-understanding. Self-concepts may be more or less elaborate, resulting in respectively more stable and moderate or volatile and extreme self-evaluations (Linville’s complexity–extremity theory). Members are indoctrinated into spying on all around, including family and friends. Deviant thoughts, feelings, and actions must be reported to leadership, otherwise, the member will be in trouble too.

  • The dissonance between two contradictory ideas, or between an idea and a behavior, creates discomfort.
  • Similar others also maximize social influence, in Cialdini’s compliance principles.
  • Firstly, the self-consistency model (Abelson, Aronson & McGuire, 1968; Aronson, 1999) addressed the paradox of the simplicity of the original theory by adding self-concept as a further explanation of dissonance.
  • Thus, students change their attitudes in order to reduce cognitive inconsistency between their attitudes (‘I don’t like the idea of a tuition increase’) and behaviors (‘I wrote an essay supporting it’).
  • By Kendra Cherry, MSEdKendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the “Everything Psychology Book.”
  • Each level directs behaviour toward the need level that is not being adequately met.
  • Leon Festinger first proposed the theory of cognitive dissonance, centered on how people try to reach internal consistency.
Share this post:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *